tons ya voy a comenzar a ahorrar, tengo que ser uno de los primeros con mi PS3
Noticias Playstation 3
65 mensajes
• Página 2 de 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
por ricardo_aries » 24-03-2006 06:41
tons ya voy a comenzar a ahorrar, tengo que ser uno de los primeros con mi PS3
- ricardo_aries
- Ciberatleta
- Mensajes: 4084
- Registrado: 07-10-2003 07:00
- Cash on hand: 0.00
Odex!
por odex » 24-03-2006 21:40
[quote]Según esas mismas webs, la física de las partículas y en general están mucho mejor que en el video mostrado en el E3.
Mi ingles debe ser muy malo o no es eso lo que esas paginas dicen o en la escuela de Sony enseñan ingles alternativo
[quote]"Compared to the E3 presentation, the game is close in presentation and functionality and look to its promise, with detail not reaching the level of the astounding E3 demo"
---Comparado con la presentacion del E3, el juego esta cerca en presentacion y funcionalidad y se ve como lo que prometia, pero no alcanzaron el nivel de detalle de la asomobrosa demo del E3---
Por mas que digan que se ve "parecido" o "es similar" claramente pone al final que "no alcanzaron el mismo nivel de detalle", osea que se ve inferior en comparacion.
[quote]"Unsurprisingly, the mention of Motorstorm cued a demonstration of the game, presented by Evolution Studios' Scott Kirkland. The demo was a far cry from the trailer which wowed audiences at E3 2005, even showing slight frame rate issues at times."
---La demostracion era lejana a la demo que hizo gritar a la audiencia en el E3 2005 y mostraba una tarifa de frames no uniforme en algunos momentos---
Por lo que ahi veo dicen que no era tan similar a lo mostrado en la E3 2005 y que tenia lios de frames. Aunque aca no estoy tan seguro de haber traducido bien.
y sumo esto:
http://www.gaming-age.com/news/2006/3/22-53
[quote]Another tech demo was shown and co-developed with Ninja Theory which had a thousand characters reacting to complex rag doll physics. The graphics were all PS2-caliber with nice post processing effects such as depth of field.
Que los graficos parecen del calibre de PS2 por procesamiento de efectos.
[quote]Warhawk, while looking great, was essentially a barren section of ocean with a lot of fighter ships (they were aiming for a hundred for the final game) going around destroying larger vessels and some nice looking water (wave simulation with procedural animation) and clouds (volumetric raytracing). Overall it was a great demo but a far cry of what was shown last year and gave a nice sobering introduction to the rest of the demos which was shown towards the end. Fortunately it will be playable at E3.
Que si bien la demo de Warhawk se ve muy bien esta lejos de ser lo mostrado en el E3 del año pasado.
[quote]Next up was Motorstorm and just like Warhawk was no where near the E3 target render. The car models and physics were decent although the texturing and the environment was PS2 level of quality. The real star of the demonstration was the deformable terrain which worked quite well with the physics of the cars. The demo also had HDR, post processing effects, and occlusion.
Que debajo de todos los efectos y particulas del MotorStorm lo que hay son modelos y texturas del nivel de PS2.
[quote]The next game was Resistance, the title formally known as I-8. Out of all the games this one was the farthest along but unfortunately the least interesting. It was your standard FPS affair with highly linear levels, decent A.I. and moderately interesting weapons. The lighting/texturing/modeling was all decent but nothing groundbreaking.
Novedades
Mapa del sitio
"SitemapIndex"